liebreaker.com -- your source for the truth!

November 5, 2006

October 9, 2006

I thought this scandal would peter out so to speak but it looks like the moderate to conservative suburban moms are really worried about their upwardly mobile kids being raped by weirdoes when they go off to Washington , DC in order to try to become part of this country's power structure. The Christians are sticking behind their men (of course, Christians are child molesters who know how to “look the other way” when the preverted priests are going nuts inside their own sick minds). The true political Christians are trying hard to stick by their men. Of course they are—molestation is a part of the power playing crowd's game. I have power over you—I am going to stick my dick in you now. That seems to be the Repiglican game, whether it's your leaders, your ministers or your neighbors. Where there is a power hungry person, sexual deviancy is not too far behind.

Hastert: Guilty! It's becoming apparent with these poll numbers that the Repiglicans know how to create “fictions” inside their minds (and in the minds of their hardcore 30% type of constituency). Is it possible that the Repiglicans did not know that the Dems had this info re: Foley and the coverup and they were completely broadsided? Did these Repiglicans really think this was all secret and that they had “contained” the situation? Bye bye Repiglicans.

The American people are onto the cover-ups. Justice is coming Repiglicans—Justice Dept, that is!

SEPTEMBER 30, 2006

10:49 mst

Mike Foley: Guilty! Resigned! Bye bye.. look into this guy's contacts with Michael Jackson—same modus operandi: pretend to be the kid's savior and Foley is really is just a lowlife sexual predator coward. This is unexpected as Foley was heading toward easy victory down there in Palm Beach . The Repiglicans are crying over this one for obvious reasons—no one can stomach a child molesters, especially child molesters who chair the “protect the kids'” committee. Is this criminal gathering the names, numbers, addresses and phone numbers of those in law enforcement and those who help law enforcement; ie., is Mike Foley nothing but a very fancy child molesting mole— snuck in during that autumn of 1994 when all the Repiglicans invaded congress? We got two problems here with Foley— 1) the obvious desire to be around children and 2) the obvious desire to be around potentially sensitive data in regards to the people who chase down molesters. Here, Foley pretended to be tracking down molesters and he was a molester himself…. Very tricky, very predictable… how long did other Repiglicans allow Foley the Molesting Mole to operate as a counter intel agent for the molesters when they knew damn well that he was a child molester? It's time to clean house.

It looks like the repiglicans are in trouble now—the house of cards is falling… is the 2008 repiglican convention going to be held in a prison???

Bob Ney: guilty!

Randy Cunninham: Guilty!

Gov. Taft: Guilty!

Tom Delay: Guilty!

dec 10, 2006

who's the next president?

It'll probably be a Dem; I say that from the heart and the mind.

McCain's got a shot but that's about it for the Repiglicans-- and,

frankly, McCain's a little old. McCain's ideas are a little old too.

He's a right wing hawk. Yeah, 50k more troops to support a elective war

based on lies... wrong idea... wrong time. Fight your own civil wars you

fuckin Arab jitbags....keep your fucking oil too. Giuliani? You're

kidding, right? Giuliani fucked his cousin a thousand times and he was a

dirtbag to his former wife; Ol Rudy makes Bill C. look like a saint.

Hillary would kick the shit out of Rudy in the general after we start

"bringiRng udy's negatives up." Romney? "I was for gay rights before I

was against them." Another crackpot from Mass... LOL. Bye. Bye.

Gingrich? These people are fuckin kidding, right?

jan 6, 2007

A lot of time we lose sight as to why we-- as a collective people-- just

don't like lawyers. It's a subculture of sadism, sickness and mental disease.

Heavy drugs and booze. HYPOCRISY. Just ask "Justice" Rehnquist. In a

country where a person can't find a job or federal student aid after

being busted on a misdemeanor pot charge this clown Rehnquist was the

Chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court while he was hallucinating on the

hardest of hard drugs-- legal pills! The guy didn't know where he was.

He was a "CIA was out to get him" type. The obviously fascist and

Hitler loving CIA and Rehnquist were on the same nasty side. Chief

Justice. He was a mean guy who wrote mean opinions. Nixon was probably

right in calling him-- Rankle, that clown. Woodward, in his book The

Brethren touches on a point about Rehnquist that I still remember after

reading the book nearly 20 years ago. His law clerks used to question

what he was drinking in his coffee cup and Rehnquist used to let them

think that-- maybe-- he was dropping some booze into his coffee in the

morning. I used to think it was the mean square trying to be cool; no,

he WAS on something. It is not cool beans at all that our nasty, racist

Chief Justice was nothing but a hallucinating drug addict. Especially

since he was so pro prosecution regarding things like drugs and search

and seizure issues. It was the Rehnquist Court which dismantled the 4th

Amendment during the 80s. More on this drug addled, Nazi clown later.

Everyone knew about Rehnquist's "problems" but they needed his Nazi Pen.

Instead of using Rehnquist's heavy drug use as evidence to deny his two

seperate elevations on the Court, the FBI used the drug use evidence as a

way to find the people who knew about the "problems" so the Feds could

attack those people if they showed up at the hearings! The FBI was

acting as investigators for a dirty law firm. Your tax dollars used to

ensure that an absolute evil, drug addled prick could do the "New World

order" types bidding with a lifetime appointment. Crack down on the dope Rankle... crack down on the dope and give us some federal control of the cities or the new world order will crack down on you....

Sunday, April 9, 2006

White House Press Secretary McClellan makes a distinction between leaks that are in the interests of national security and those that are not. Okay, fine, logical rule. Now, let's apply it: how in the hell is it "in the interests of national security" to leak Val Plame's name and status? How can it benefit national security to blow Brewster Jenning, Inc.'s cover? It seems to me that if we apply McClellan's Rule, Bush is in more trouble than ever.

SATURDAY, APRIL 8 2006

It's been revealed: George W. Bush is the leaker. Big surprise. Can this "declassification" possibly be legal? I don't think so due to the declassification's maliciousness and lack of notice and its apparent use for poltical gain. I wonder what his dad thinks?

Even if Bush is immune from prosecution due to some sort of positivist legal theory that makes him king, he is still probably violating the constitutional right to be free from governmental interference with contract under which amendment, I'll need to check. It reminds me of the bad guy cops trying to turn the tables on Dirty Harry in Magnum Force, those pricks. Reminds me of the recently convicted cop / mob guys in New York. Let's assume Bush is immune from criminal prosecution regarding the leak itself. To declassify a spook without giving her (or her assets) notice is just NUTS! All this husband wife, father son nephew stuff leads us back to the CIA building itself: the GHW BUSH CIA BUILDING.

I am sure a spook signs a contract with the CIA that gets hidden away somewhere; a spook promises a lot to the government when they sign up and I bet the government promises something back. I bet there's a promise in there by the government that goes something like: and in return for all your patriotic sacrifice, Ms. Plame WE THE FEDS promise not to completely fuck you in the ass for political convenience of one party and one man. In this case, the fuck-er happens to be the kid of the guy the CIA Building is named after. Shakespearean at the very least.

DID BUSH LIE TO A FEDERAL INVESTIGATOR (maybe Cheney lied too)?

While they were not under oath, they were talking to a federal investigator; ie., they were talking to Patrick Fitzgerald who happened to be investigating the case. I'll bet they lied to Fitz and I bet they conspired to lie to Fitz too.

The Libby Trial -- January 24, 2007

I'm not sure what the “Libby as Sacrificial Lamb” defense can bring them; it sounds a lot like Tim McVeigh's defense which basically said “I'm not guilty because there were more people involved” than are being tried here in this courtroom. Mcveigh's defense got McVeigh the Big Needle to Eternity is what McVeigh's defense got him. I guess the prosecution might call some White House people and Libby's defense could be preparing to undermine their credibility. It does not sound to me like there is exculpatory evidence out there; maybe they are already trying to mitigate a sentence that they know is coming. It is sort of a strange defense. It's sure going to be fun hearing about Dick Cheney getting cross examined!

4/12/2008

"You go into some of these small towns in Pennsylvania, and like a lot of small towns in the Midwest, the jobs have been gone now for 25 years and nothing's replaced them," Obama, an Illinois senator, said.

"And it's not surprising then they get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren't like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations," he said.

Very perceptive and bold statement Barry; in the spring of 2006 I took a bicycle ride thru small town midwest and into Harisburg, Pa and I met some very nice folks who indeeed appeared to me to be clinging to some pretty outdated ideas.

No pandering by Barak on this issue. Way to go.

See: http://www.lostharvest.com

for my fictional treatment of this sort of idea